<< Back to main Indicators page
Guiding Questions
a. Is this goal right?b. Are the key issues the right key issues?
c. Are the indicators meaningful and useful?
d. Are there numeric targets for this goal that make sense?
Get Our Newsletter
BE13-HISTORIC RESOURCES
1 Respect, preserve, restore,interpret, and make accessible archeological and historic resources.
Key Issue - Why do we care? What is the problem?
0 Archeological and historic resources are important not only because they help define the region's identity and contribute to our quality of life, but also because they may perform important present-day functions and promote tourism
Key Indicators - How are we doing?
|
0 National Heritage Resources 0 Chittenden County |
0 National Heritage Organizations 0 Chittenden County |
|
17
|
17
|
|
0 Source: Champlain Valley National Heritage Partnership Management Plan |
Other/Supporting Indicators
0 Number of historic and archaeological sites
0 Acres of historic and archaeological sites
Other/supporting indicators:
Other/supporting indicators:
These two are way too broad, IMO. They assume we know where all of the resources are. (Are we trying to measure the resource or the impacts we are having on the resource?) Might be more feasible to focus on the latter.
It is nice to say we will
It is nice to say we will respect these resources, but can respect be measured, as a practical matter? Is the goal too complex (too many features/facets)?
There is a lot of infor here
There is a lot of infor here but I’m not sure what we really need to measure this goal? Presuming all of these resources shown on chart are heritage, can we have graph with historical aggregate by year? Also presuming that we want more Heritage organizations (why?) can we use a graph of the historical aggregate? example do we want more Heritage organizations?
Add new comment